Which States Are Winning on Spending, Taxes, and School Choice? | This Week's Economy Ep. 1176/23/2025 What’s driving state-level prosperity—or stagnation?
While Washington obsesses over headlines and dysfunction, the real policy battles shaping Americans’ lives are happening in state capitals. From tax cuts and spending reforms to school choice and regulatory rollbacks, we’re seeing a tale of two paths: one that embraces economic freedom and another that doubles down on top-down control. In this episode of This Week’s Economy, I talk with Patrick Gleason, Vice President of State Affairs at Americans for Tax Reform and regular contributor to Forbes, about the most important trends in state policy. We get into who’s doing it right, who’s doing it wrong, and how to push back against the growing threats of government overreach. You can catch the full episode on YouTube, Apple Podcast, or Spotify. Visit: VanceGinn.com Subscribe: VanceGinn.Substack.com
0 Comments
There’s been a lot of conflict making headlines lately—from the clash between Elon Musk and President Trump over the “Big, Beautiful Bill” (BBB) to riots in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids. These events all point to the true national emergency: overspending in Washington. Congress has a critical opportunity to take action. As a strong advocate for sustainable budgeting, we must cut current spending, not just slow the growth as in “DC speak,” but actually reduce spending to at least 2019 levels before COVID nonsense, and cap annual spending growth to a maximum rate based on population growth plus inflation. Instead, lawmakers discuss raising the federal debt ceiling by up to $5 trillion with the BBB.
In this week’s episode, I explain why now is the time to restore fiscal discipline. Americans are already feeling the strain of rising costs due to inflation. Our leaders have the power to address this crisis by tackling Washington’s out-of-control spending. You can catch the full episode on YouTube, Apple Podcast, or Spotify. Visit: VanceGinn.com Subscribe: VanceGinn.Substack.com Originally published at Kansas Policy Institute.
From Topeka to Washington, too many politicians are combining tax relief with bloated budgets—and it’s putting future prosperity at riskKansas’s recent fiscal trajectory offers a cautionary tale for federal policymakers. While tax relief is essential for economic growth, pairing it with unchecked spending can lead to fiscal instability. The state’s experience underscores the importance of coupling tax reforms with disciplined budgeting—a lesson Washington should heed as it considers the so-called “One Big, Beautiful Bill” (OBBB). Kansas: The Perils of Overspending Over the past decade, Kansas has seen both the promise and the peril of bold tax reform. In the early 2010s, the state attempted a major tax overhaul under then-Governor Sam Brownback, slashing income tax rates in hopes of spurring growth. However, the tax cuts were not paired with corresponding reductions in spending. Instead, state budgets continued to expand, and the resulting deficits sparked political backlash and fiscal instability. Fast-forward to 2025, and Kansas again finds itself in a precarious fiscal position. The Legislature recently passed another tax relief package aimed at flattening income tax rates and reducing the property tax burden—moves that are pro-growth in theory. However, these reforms come alongside a surge in state spending. Our research at KPI shows that, for 2025 alone, the state budget is $8.7 billion larger than if spending had followed a responsible limit based on population growth plus inflation since 2005. Spending per resident has soared to unsustainable levels, outpacing economic growth and increasing the burden on Kansas taxpayers. Kansas’s state government spending per resident was $5,428, placing it 23rd highest among the states. State and local tax collections per capita stood at $6,326 in 2022, ranking Kansas 24th nationally, well above no-income-tax states like Florida and Texas. This high tax burden helps explain why Kansas has seen a net outmigration of nearly 198,000 residents since 2000. Forecasts show Kansas facing a $741 million deficit within four years. Assuming these projections are accurate, it is not because of the tax cuts but because of unsustainable spending growth. A decade after the first tax reform attempt, Kansas still grapples with the consequences of failing to control government expansion. The lesson is clear: even the best tax reforms can falter without fiscal discipline. The Responsible Kansas Budget: A Blueprint for Reform To address these challenges, Kansas needs to adopt KPI’s Responsible Kansas Budget (RKB). This simple yet powerful framework starts by demanding real cuts to inflated spending now—not just limiting future growth. Only then can state and local spending growth be effectively capped to population growth plus inflation, a measure of what taxpayers can sustainably afford. By taking this two-step approach—cutting first, capping second—Kansas can reduce the government’s burden, avoid deficits, and create room for meaningful tax relief. This framework is a prerequisite for long-term stability. The RKB also demands a shift toward performance-based budgeting. That means funding decisions should be based on outcomes, not historical inertia. Dedicated funds and earmarked programs currently dominate the Kansas budget, limiting lawmakers’ flexibility and reducing transparency. These automatic appropriations are a recipe for bloat and inefficiency. A responsible budget should reflect real priorities, not legacy carveouts or special interests. And it should reject the fallacy of burden-shifting—replacing one tax with another—without actually reducing the total tax load on Kansans. With a responsible budget and sound tax policy, Kansas could join the growing number of states advancing toward flatter and simpler tax systems. Over a dozen states have already adopted or are moving toward flat income taxes, and several—including Florida, Tennessee, and Texas—have eliminated income taxes entirely in favor of consumption-based models that encourage savings, investment, and growth. Washington’s “One Big, Beautiful Bill”: Echoes of Kansas At the federal level, the “One Big, Beautiful Bill” (OBBB) mirrors Kansas’s approach in its ambition and flaws. The bill includes several encouraging provisions:
Medicaid Reforms: Necessary but Potentially Disruptive Among the most important components of OBBB are the long-overdue reforms to Medicaid. These changes aim to rein in ballooning entitlement costs and require work among capable adults. For Kansas, however, this could initially create budgetary pressure if federal matching funds are reduced or enrollment drops more quickly than anticipated. However, short-term stress should not deter long-term reform. Kansas must begin to wean itself off the federal budget, in Medicaid and elsewhere, especially in programs where dependency has grown far beyond the original intent. Taxpayers in Kansas are being overtaxed to support an unsustainable federal system. Rather than fearing change, Kansas should seize the opportunity to modernize its Medicaid program, cut costs, and move toward a more state-driven and fiscally responsible healthcare model. Tax Carveouts vs. Tax Reform Whether in Topeka or D.C., the distinction between tax carveouts and true tax reform is critical. Carveouts are a form of cronyism: they reward lobbyists and special interests, not families and small businesses. They complicate the tax code, reduce transparency, and make it harder to achieve long-term economic growth. By contrast, real tax reform broadens the base and lowers the rate for all taxpayers. It removes distortions, encourages work and productivity, and treats taxpayers equitably. The federal government should follow the lead of states like Kansas (when done right), Arizona, and Iowa by simplifying the tax code and moving toward a broad-based consumption model, not patchwork exemptions. Simply shifting the burden from income to consumption taxes isn’t enough—real reform must actually reduce the total burden on taxpayers. Why Spending Discipline Matters No tax policy can succeed in the long run without spending control. When spending outpaces economic growth, the gap must be filled with higher taxes, borrowing, or inflation—all of which harm the private economy. We’ve seen this nationally, as federal spending exploded during COVID-19 and remained high even after the emergency passed. And let’s not ignore federal borrowing. With debt levels now nearing $37 trillion, future generations will bear the burden of today’s excesses. Every trillion in new debt erodes trust, crowds out private investment, and raises the specter of inflation. In Kansas, the failure to reduce spending has led to budget shortfalls even in times of economic growth. That’s because the state government has locked itself into long-term obligations and special funds that leave little room for discretion. Every dollar funneled into a dedicated account is one less that can be used for tax relief or urgent needs. In Washington, the same problem plays out in the form of entitlement autopilot and defense contractor guarantees. Unless both levels of government prioritize spending restraint, tax relief will be short-lived and economic growth will stall. As states and the federal government consider long-term reform, one of the most promising directions is a shift from taxing income to taxing consumption. Income taxes penalize productivity, savings, and investment—the very engines of economic growth. Consumption taxes, by contrast, are less distortionary and more transparent. A flat consumption tax, such as a final sales tax, aligns incentives and simplifies compliance. Texas and Florida have demonstrated the viability of no-income-tax models, relying instead on consumption-based revenue systems. Kansas should explore similar reforms by reducing reliance on income taxes and eliminating carve-outs that clutter the code. At the federal level, replacing income and payroll taxes with a broad-based consumption tax could boost growth, improve compliance, and reduce the tax gap. But that can only happen if spending is first brought under control to avoid just shifting the burden. A Time for Courageous Leadership The opportunity is clear: Kansas and Washington can implement sustainable, pro-growth tax reform. But doing so requires real courage. It means cutting unnecessary programs, resisting special interests, and saying no to budget gimmicks. It means adopting a responsible budget cap—like the RKB—and sticking to it. In Kansas, that starts with ending the use of dedicated funds to circumvent scrutiny. It means evaluating programs on performance and eliminating those that fail to deliver value. It means using surpluses for tax relief or debt reduction, not new spending obligations. It means getting Kelly Era spending surges under control. In Washington, it means pairing tax relief with real entitlement reform. It means capping spending growth and ending the practice of raising the debt ceiling without structural change. Conclusion: The Path to Prosperity Tax relief is not enough. Without spending discipline, it leads to deficits, debt, and future tax hikes. Kansas has seen this firsthand and must not repeat the mistakes of a decade ago. Washington is at risk of making the same errors now. The path to prosperity lies in cutting inflated spending now, capping future growth, enacting broad-based tax reform, and shrinking the government’s footprint. Only then can we ensure a truly free and prosperous future. Washington would be wise to follow. Originally posted at Pelican Institute.
Congress is moving fast on a sweeping package known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB)—and it could have real implications for Louisiana. While the OBBB includes some beneficial provisions, especially by extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts, the bill overall fails to deliver the kind of fiscal discipline and pro-growth reform America needs. If anything, it reflects a dangerous continuation of Washington’s deficit spending spree. That’s a warning sign for Louisianans who want to see lower taxes, more opportunity, and a more responsible federal government. The OBBB: What It Gets Right—and What It Doesn’t The U.S. House recently passed the OBBB, which is now under review in the Senate. The legislation would:
Extending the TCJA helps maintain some degree of predictability for taxpayers and businesses. That alone reduces uncertainty and allows for better planning and investment. However, the other so-called “relief” measures are classic tax code distortions. Exempting tips, overtime, or Social Security benefits from taxation may sound good politically, but they complicate the code and narrow the base. Every carveout like this means higher tax rates elsewhere or more debt. Instead, the focus should be on across-the-board rate reductions funded by spending restraint. Still Too Much Spending, Still Too Many Gimmicks While the tax reforms in the OBBB are directionally helpful, the bill still suffers from two major flaws:
What It Means for Louisiana Louisiana taxpayers may see a short-term benefit. Workers could take home more pay, and families might enjoy marginally lower tax burdens. But federal fiscal irresponsibility won’t stay in Washington. It ripples through the economy. When Congress runs massive deficits, it puts upward pressure on inflation and interest rates—costs that fall disproportionately on low—and middle-income Americans. If spending continues unchecked, future tax hikes or program cuts are inevitable. How Will It Affect My Taxes?
These are tangible benefits. But they come with a cost—unless matched with spending reductions, they contribute to an unsustainable fiscal trajectory. How Will It Affect My Job? In the short term, businesses may benefit from lower tax compliance costs and marginally stronger hiring incentives. But rising federal debt threatens to crowd out private investment over time. Louisiana’s economy, heavily dependent on energy, trade, and small businesses, needs more than tax tweaks. It needs a leaner federal government. A Missed Opportunity to Do Better The U.S. Senate can—and should—fix the worst parts of the OBBB. That means:
These changes would help ensure tax relief isn’t just a temporary sugar high. They would also align with Louisiana’s needs: broad, lasting reforms that empower workers and businesses without fueling inflation or debt. The Louisiana Connection Back in Baton Rouge, lawmakers are navigating their budget debates. Thanks to economic growth and some early tax reforms, new revenue—roughly $155 million—is on the table. However, too much of the state budget is still soaked in pork projects and misplaced priorities. For example, the Senate Finance Committee just slashed funding for the new LA GATOR program to help families choose a school or educational program that fits their child’s needs, yet increased funding for the public schools families are trying to leave. They also added millions in more pork projects. This is precisely why Louisiana needs a Responsible Louisiana Budget, which would cap spending growth at the rate of population growth plus inflation. It’s a simple rule to ensure the budget doesn’t grow faster than what taxpayers can afford. If federal aid begins to shrink or federal work requirements increase state responsibilities, Louisiana will need even more discipline to weather the storm. The Bottom Line The One Big Beautiful Bill is a mixed bag. It offers short-term tax relief, especially by extending the TCJA, but fails to rein in the federal spending binge sufficiently. It’s not the pro-growth reform Americans need. At best, it reduces uncertainty by keeping some of the 2017 tax cuts in place. Louisiana lawmakers and residents should take note. Don’t count on D.C. to get this right. Push the Senate to improve the bill. And demand real spending discipline at the state level to ensure federal relief translates into real prosperity, not more fiscal risk. Originally posted to X.
We are in a time of real uncertainty. The economy looks strong on the surface, but beneath the top-line numbers, cracks are forming. Real GDP shrank by 0.3% in Q1 2025. That’s a contraction, even as inflation remains persistent. The PCE price index jumped 3.6%, and core PCE rose 3.5%. That’s a textbook case of stagflation—shrinking output and rising prices. We’re told this is temporary, but the trends suggest something deeper. The government continues to crowd out private activity, distort incentives, and erode long-term confidence in markets and money. The labor market is weakening, too. April’s report showed 177,000 new jobs, but most were part-time or government-funded. Labor force participation is stuck at 62.6%, and long-term unemployment rose to 1.7 million people. Real wage gains are flat. More and more Americans are working harder just to maintain the same standard of living. That’s why consumer sentiment is collapsing. The University of Michigan’s sentiment index fell to 50.8 in May—the second-lowest on record. Inflation expectations jumped to 7.3% for the year ahead, and three-quarters of consumers cite tariffs and trade policy as a top concern. So, where is all of this coming from? Part of it is misguided economic policy. Congress continues to spend far beyond its means. From 2015 to 2024, federal outlays grew 88%, while population and inflation combined rose 27.6%. If lawmakers had held spending to that sustainable rate, we could’ve saved $2.2 trillion in 2024 alone—and avoided piling on over $14 trillion in new debt over the last decade. But here’s the deeper issue: we’ve strayed from our founding economic philosophy. Instead of trusting markets and individual liberty, Washington increasingly turns to industrial policy, central planning, and populist redistribution schemes. Just look at the so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill.” It rightly proposes to extend the Trump tax cuts, especially full expensing, which I support because it drives long-term investment and productivity. But the bill lacks the spending discipline needed to make the tax relief permanent. And without real fiscal reform, the benefits of pro-growth tax policy will be overwhelmed by mounting debt and inflation. Worse, there’s a bipartisan trend toward national industrial policy—a top-down economic model that claims to fix market failures by directing capital, picking favored sectors, and subsidizing politically popular industries. That’s not conservatism. That’s not capitalism. It’s 21st-century mercantilism dressed in red, white, and blue. As I recently argued in response to American Compass's Techno-Industrial Policy Playbook, this vision of the economy requires massive government coordination and the suppression of market signals. It replaces competition with cronyism and freedom with favoritism. We must resist this drift, whether from the left or national populists on the right. The answer isn’t technocratic planning or populist backlash. The answer is classical liberalism: free enterprise, voluntary exchange, sound money, property rights, and constitutionally limited government. This is the tradition of Hayek, Friedman, Sowell, and Buchanan. It’s what built American prosperity, and it’s what will save it. I call my roadmap the Let Americans Prosper Framework. It’s grounded in two simple ideas:
The states show it’s possible. States like Florida, Iowa, and North Dakota are practicing sustainable budgeting. They’re attracting new residents and businesses. Meanwhile, states that pursue bigger budgets, higher taxes, and corporate favoritism are watching people leave. Even in Texas, where I live and work, we see warning signs. Despite a massive $24 billion surplus, the legislature passed a bloated $336 billion budget for 2026–27. Funds like the Texas Future Fund and other constitutionally dedicated accounts sidestep spending caps and create long-term liabilities. That’s not the Texas model I signed up for. We need to get back to first principles. Less spending. More freedom. Real growth. That means:
|
Vance Ginn, Ph.D.
|