GINN ECONOMIC CONSULTING
  • Home
  • SERVICES
  • Media
  • RESEARCH
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • About
  • Home
  • SERVICES
  • Media
  • RESEARCH
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • About

Parents, Not Politicians, Should Raise Our Kids—SB 2420 and HB 4901 Get It Backwards

4/15/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
Originally posted to X. 

Texas families don’t need more government telling them how to parent. They need more freedom, tools, and trust. But Senate Bill 2420 and its companion House Bill 4901—misleadingly named the App Store Accountability Act—head in the exact wrong direction.

While the bill’s stated goal is to protect children online, it does so by inserting the state into decisions that should be left to families. SB 2420 would require app stores to verify users’ ages, assign minors to their parents’ accounts, and block access to apps unless parental consent is obtained. It even mandates sharing sensitive information across platforms to enforce these requirements. What’s presented as a safety measure is a sweeping government mandate that undermines parental rights, tramples privacy, and punishes innovation.

Let’s be clear: protecting kids online matters. As a father of three, I understand the desire to shield our children from harmful content and bad influences. But that doesn’t mean we hand over the reins to government bureaucrats or force businesses into the role of digital babysitter.

SB 2420 assumes that politicians know better than parents. That’s not just offensive—it’s dangerous. It takes control out of the hands of families and gives it to tech platforms acting under state orders. The bill would require app stores to determine who qualifies as a parent or guardian, decide what age is appropriate for each app, and share user data across platforms to verify compliance—all without user consent. That’s a privacy disaster waiting to happen.

Texans should be deeply concerned about what this means for digital autonomy. When the government mandates age verification and app restrictions without consent, it opens the door to surveillance, data abuse, and censorship. Once the government starts dictating what apps your child can or can’t use, how long before it extends that power to adults?

We’ve seen what happens when states try to micromanage the tech world. California’s heavy-handed regulations have led to less innovation, fewer choices, and higher compliance costs that only the biggest tech companies can afford. If Texas adopts this bill, we risk driving away startups, stifling competition, and consolidating even more power in the hands of Silicon Valley giants. Ironically, SB 2420 would hurt the very competition lawmakers say they want to promote.

SB 2420 also distorts accountability. Instead of holding app developers responsible for harmful content or features, the bill targets app stores—the platforms that distribute them. That’s like punishing bookstores instead of the authors. It’s a classic case of misaligned incentives: pushing liability upstream to avoid tackling the real issues downstream.

But perhaps most troubling is how this bill sidelines the most important players in a child’s life—parents. Every family is different. What one parent considers inappropriate, another may see as an opportunity to teach and guide. That’s the beauty of parental freedom. One-size-fits-all mandates erase those differences and enforce government-approved parenting.

This isn’t about ignoring the risks kids face online. It’s about choosing the right response. We should empower parents with better tools, not replace them with regulations. Tech companies are already responding to consumer demand by offering advanced parental controls, app filters, and usage tracking—solutions that let families decide what works best for them. That’s the free-market approach that respects both liberty and responsibility.

Lawmakers who care about protecting kids should focus on education, transparency, and innovation. They should encourage companies to compete on safety features and support digital literacy programs that help parents and kids make informed choices. But they shouldn’t centralize control in Austin and pretend that’s a substitute for real parenting.

SB 2420 may be well-intentioned, but it’s the wrong solution. It’s terrible for privacy. Bad for innovation. And worst of all, it sends the message that government—not parents—should be in charge.

Texans know better. We don’t need the state raising our kids. Let’s trust families. Let’s trust freedom.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Vance Ginn, Ph.D.
    ​@LetPeopleProsper

    Vance Ginn, Ph.D., is President of Ginn Economic Consulting and collaborates with more than 20 free-market think tanks to let people prosper. Follow him on X: @vanceginn and subscribe to his newsletter: vanceginn.substack.com

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Antitrust
    Banking
    Biden
    Book Reviews
    Budgets
    Capitalism
    Carbon Tax
    China
    Commentary
    Congress
    COVID
    Debt
    Economic Freedom
    Economy
    Education
    Energy Markets
    ESG
    Fed
    Free Trade
    Ginn Economic Brief
    Healthcare
    Housing
    Immigration
    Inflation
    Interview
    Jobs Report
    Kansas
    Let People Prosper
    Licensing
    Louisiana
    Medicaid
    Medicare
    Minimum Wage
    Occupational Licensing
    Pensions
    Policy Guide
    Poverty
    Price Control
    Property Taxes
    Regulation
    Research
    School Choice
    Socialism
    Speech
    Spending Limits
    Taxes
    Technology
    Testimony
    Texas
    This Week's Economy
    Transparency
    Trump

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly